health insurance wsj
76% of support for the election of a public option – Want a choice?
Survey conducted by NBC / WSJ asked if it was important offer people a choice of a public choice in addition to private health insurance and 76% said it was "very important" or "somewhat important. "The word 'choice' is important because if you ask people if they want a public choice in the draft health care law, only 47% say yes. So you want an election? http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/06/17/obama-boost-new-poll-show_n_217175.html just for you can not claim prejudice, NBC is generally perceived as liberal and the WSJ, is too conservative, lol. Conservatives have their hands over their ears saying "can not the I hear "
He made the survey asks whether they would like more than a thousand choices they would if they were allowed to buy insurance across state lines, or just another option provided by the federal government? clear thousand more options would give people a better option that has been designed for them and their needs specific and not just one more option. Then you should have the debate about whether an option is not required to make a profit provider of that choice, fair competition is maintained because it makes the rules that other options to play. Or that if the option can not run an effective industry because the government is not known for being frugal with the money of others. As a matter of fact I can not think of a program running that is efficient and works well, right?
Natural Food Fight: Whole Foods and Health Care
