malpractice insurance cap
Medical Malpractice Caps?
I think people should know that people like George Bush and the Republicans are trying to impose limits on the demands medical malpractice for pain and suffering limits to $ 250,000. This includes injuries involving death, blindness, paralysis, loss of a limb, and many other horrific injuries that can happen to any of us. These people defend this in the name of the costs of health care, and meanwhile, There are many studies showing no correlation between Med mal insurance and caps demand. People should know that there are over 100,000 deaths attributed to medical malpractice – Not to mention all the people maimed by negligent doctors, however, Bush and Republicans support this, as they claim to support freedom and justice around the word. I would like know where is the justice for the innocent victims and families facing headaches due to medical negligence – 250k will probably not work. Only promote more careless doctors to practice medicine insecure. ANY1 How do others feel?
Absolutely. In California, we have a limit bad medicine in recovery for "pain and suffering" which applies even if the court physician malpracticing bad leg, killed patients or simply rendered a quadriplegic patient. However, if you are in a car accident, there is no limit to what can be awarded by a jury of injury. No sense, is unfair and a fraud on the public. When politicians talk about "tort reform" that tend to ignore the fact that each security device all cars sold in the U.S. is a direct result of a lawsuit filed by a lawyer against a car manufacturer because it failed to incorporate the latest security measures in an automobile. The public will pay for security. Our streets and highways are safer because of the demands that have led them to be. Look at the newspapers and find examples of the behavior of "captains of industry" to see how reliable it is and how concerned they are about the "person common "that has been victim cooperation through him. Ouch.
Cap City Demo Video
