malpractice insurance price
The Liberals, why not try these first set of health?
1. Tort reform: limit the amount of money for malpractice insurance a doctor must pay for the pain and suffering. 2. Another liability reform: loser pays. The plaintiff can sue, but if you lose, pay fees doctor. Reduce frivolous lawsuits. Both articles are cut at an angle of malpractice insurance high that comes to us when we pay. also regulate insurance companies so they pay nothing, but the great events Mediacal. Having children, car accidents, cancer, stroke, attack heart, surgery, etc., patients have to pay for items under a couple thousand dollars in cash. This will lower the price of health insurance, and force doctors to market to the patient, not insurance companies. Like lasik doctors do. They compete with each other to maintain prices low. And the print price lists so you know what it costs. Why these things should not be tried before moving over one billion dollars of money that we have?
"It also regulates insurance companies so they pay nothing, but large events Mediacal. Having babies, car accidents, cancer, stroke, heart attack, surgery, etc. have to pay for items under a few thousand patients in cash. "That sounds familiar. I agree with the reform of civil liability, 100%.
Chairman Rick Price on Defined Benefits & Liability Ins.
